Backstage vs Hugging Face
Backstage vs Hugging Face, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Backstage is on 57/100 and Hugging Face on 76/100.
Where each one leads
Backstage
- headcount: 18,703 against 726
- LinkedIn following: 4,542,046 against 73,659
Hugging Face
- our overall score: 76/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 60/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 75/100
- funding raised: $395M against $63.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Backstage | Hugging Face |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An open-source developer portal for building and managing software. | Hugging Face is the leading AI community and platform for machine learning collaboration, enabling developers to build, share, and deploy models, datasets, and applications. |
| Category | Developer Tools, MLOps, DevInfra, Open Source | AI, Machine Learning, SaaS, Open Source |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Stockholm, Sweden | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Backstage | Hugging Face |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18,703 | 726 |
| Total funding | $63.0M | $395M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series D |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $4.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,542,046 | 73,659 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Backstage | Hugging Face |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 76/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 10/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 45/100 | 68/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 85/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | C (60/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Backstage | Hugging Face |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Fastly | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Svelte, Tailwind CSS |
| Payments | Not detected | Stripe |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Backstage | Hugging Face |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | ML Collaboration Platform, Extensive Model & Dataset Hub, Open Source ML Tooling, Scalable Compute & Deployment, Enterprise-Grade Solutions, Community-Driven Development |
Backstage vs Hugging Face: common questions
Which is better, Backstage or Hugging Face?
On our 0-100 score Hugging Face rates higher (76/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Backstage and Hugging Face compare on the numbers?
Backstage leads on headcount (18,703 against 726), LinkedIn following (4,542,046 against 73,659). Hugging Face leads on our overall score (76/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (60/100 against 30/100), domain rating (91/100 against 75/100), funding raised ($395M against $63.0M).
Read the full Backstage review and pricing or the Hugging Face review and pricing. You can also browse other Backstage alternatives we track.