Backslash Security vs Veracode
Backslash Security vs Veracode, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Backslash Security is on 56/100 and Veracode on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Backslash Security
- agent readiness: 61/100 against 47/100
- headcount growth: +30.8% against -10.4%
Veracode
- our overall score: 62/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 503 against 40
- funding raised: $40.0M against $27.0M
- LinkedIn following: 85,248 against 4,739
At a glance
| Measure | Backslash Security | Veracode |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agentic endpoint security for AI coding, providing visibility, governance, and real-time protection. | Veracode provides a SaaS platform for application security testing and risk management. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, AppSec, Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) | Cybersecurity, SaaS, Software Development |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Burlington, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Backslash Security | Veracode |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 40 | 503 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +30.8% | -10.4% |
| Total funding | $27.0M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series F |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,739 | 85,248 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Backslash Security | Veracode |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (61/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Backslash Security | Veracode |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Backslash Security vs Veracode: common questions
Which is better, Backslash Security or Veracode?
On our 0-100 score Veracode rates higher (62/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Backslash Security and Veracode compare on the numbers?
Backslash Security leads on agent readiness (61/100 against 47/100), headcount growth (+30.8% against -10.4%). Veracode leads on our overall score (62/100 against 56/100), domain rating (80/100 against 55/100), headcount (503 against 40), funding raised ($40.0M against $27.0M), LinkedIn following (85,248 against 4,739).
Read the full Backslash Security review and pricing or the Veracode review and pricing. You can also browse other Backslash Security alternatives we track.