Backslash Security vs Ent Security
Backslash Security vs Ent Security, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Backslash Security is on 56/100 and Ent Security on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Backslash Security
- our overall score: 56/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 61/100 against 48/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 30/100
Ent Security
- funding raised: $100M against $27.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Backslash Security | Ent Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agentic endpoint security for AI coding, providing visibility, governance, and real-time protection. | Intent-aware endpoint security that reads the intent behind user and AI agent actions before risky actions are completed. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, AppSec, Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Endpoint Security, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Backslash Security | Ent Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 40 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +30.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $27.0M | $100M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,739 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Backslash Security | Ent Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 14/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (61/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 30/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Backslash Security | Ent Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Linkedin Insight | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Backslash Security vs Ent Security: common questions
Which is better, Backslash Security or Ent Security?
On our 0-100 score Backslash Security rates higher (56/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Backslash Security and Ent Security compare on the numbers?
Backslash Security leads on our overall score (56/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (61/100 against 48/100), domain rating (55/100 against 30/100). Ent Security leads on funding raised ($100M against $27.0M).
Read the full Backslash Security review and pricing or the Ent Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Backslash Security alternatives we track.