Aviv Scientific vs Inner Cosmos
Aviv Scientific vs Inner Cosmos, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aviv Scientific is on 54/100 and Inner Cosmos on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Aviv Scientific
- domain rating: 48/100 against 26/100
- headcount: 19 against 15
- funding raised: $40.0M against $10.0M
Inner Cosmos
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 30/100
- headcount growth: +2.1% against -22.9%
At a glance
| Measure | Aviv Scientific | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global network of clinics using AI and data science to treat age-related cognitive and functional decline. | Developing a digital pill to rebalance brain networks using imperceptible micro-stimulations. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Neurology, Brain | Healthcare, Brain, Sensor, Human Machine Interface |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aviv Scientific | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 15 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -22.9% | +2.1% |
| Total funding | $40.0M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,812 | 1,815 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aviv Scientific | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 48/100 | 26/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aviv Scientific | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Hetzner |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Freshdesk | Not detected |
Aviv Scientific vs Inner Cosmos: common questions
Which is better, Aviv Scientific or Inner Cosmos?
Both score the same on our 0-100 rating, so the choice comes down to the 21 data points in the tables above rather than overall company strength.
How do Aviv Scientific and Inner Cosmos compare on the numbers?
Aviv Scientific leads on domain rating (48/100 against 26/100), headcount (19 against 15), funding raised ($40.0M against $10.0M). Inner Cosmos leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 30/100), headcount growth (+2.1% against -22.9%).
Read the full Aviv Scientific review and pricing or the Inner Cosmos review and pricing. You can also browse other Aviv Scientific alternatives we track.