Avicena vs Ncodin
Avicena vs Ncodin, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Avicena is on 60/100 and Ncodin on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Avicena
- our overall score: 60/100 against 56/100
- headcount: 91 against 39
- funding raised: $50.0M against $22.2M
- LinkedIn following: 4,474 against 2,947
Ncodin
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Avicena | Ncodin |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Avicena develops microLED interconnects for AI data centers, enabling ultra-low power, high bandwidth chip-to-chip optical connections. | Ncodin develops optical interposer technology with integrated nanolasers to overcome the limitations of traditional copper interconnects for AI. |
| Category | AI Hardware, Semiconductor, Chip Design, AI Infrastructure | AI Hardware & Chips, Semiconductor, Chip Design, Photonic Chip Design |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2021 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, United States | Palaiseau, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Avicena | Ncodin |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 91 | 39 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +29.9% | +35.8% |
| Total funding | $50.0M | $22.2M |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,474 | 2,947 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Avicena | Ncodin |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 31/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Avicena | Ncodin |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | OVH |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
Avicena vs Ncodin: common questions
Which is better, Avicena or Ncodin?
On our 0-100 score Avicena rates higher (60/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Avicena and Ncodin compare on the numbers?
Avicena leads on our overall score (60/100 against 56/100), headcount (91 against 39), funding raised ($50.0M against $22.2M), LinkedIn following (4,474 against 2,947).
Read the full Avicena review and pricing or the Ncodin review and pricing. You can also browse other Avicena alternatives we track.