Avery Dennison vs Impinj
Avery Dennison vs Impinj, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Avery Dennison is on 33/100 and Impinj on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Avery Dennison
- domain rating: 80/100 against 71/100
- headcount: 22,032 against 444
- LinkedIn following: 814,596 against 26,255
Impinj
- our overall score: 66/100 against 33/100
- agent readiness: 43/100 against 32/100
At a glance
| Measure | Avery Dennison | Impinj |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global materials science and digital identification solutions company specializing in labeling and RFID technology. | Provider of RAIN RFID solutions for item tracking. |
| Category | Materials Science, Labeling, RFID, Digital Identification | Internet of Things (IoT), Hardware, Supply Chain Management, Retail Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | hardware | services | platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 1935 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Mentor, United States | Seattle, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Avery Dennison | Impinj |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 22,032 | 444 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +5.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $237M |
| Latest round | Not published | Post IPO |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 814,596 | 26,255 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Avery Dennison | Impinj |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 33/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Avery Dennison | Impinj |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager |
Avery Dennison vs Impinj: common questions
Which is better, Avery Dennison or Impinj?
On our 0-100 score Impinj rates higher (66/100 against 33/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Avery Dennison and Impinj compare on the numbers?
Avery Dennison leads on domain rating (80/100 against 71/100), headcount (22,032 against 444), LinkedIn following (814,596 against 26,255). Impinj leads on our overall score (66/100 against 33/100), agent readiness (43/100 against 32/100).
Read the full Avery Dennison review and pricing or the Impinj review and pricing. You can also browse other Avery Dennison alternatives we track.