AVertto vs CardiacSense
AVertto vs CardiacSense, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AVertto is on 26/100 and CardiacSense on 51/100.
Where each one leads
AVertto
- headcount growth: +29.2% against +3.3%
CardiacSense
- our overall score: 51/100 against 26/100
- domain rating: 34/100 against 4/100
- headcount: 39 against 12
- LinkedIn following: 7,325 against 469
At a glance
| Measure | AVertto | CardiacSense |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing a non-invasive device to detect silent strokes in high-risk populations. | CardiacSense develops a CE and FDA-cleared medical watch for continuous cardiac monitoring and arrhythmia detection. |
| Category | Healthcare, Non-invasive, Blood Pressure, Strokes | Healthcare, Digital Health, Sensor, Wearable |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2021 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AVertto | CardiacSense |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 12 | 39 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +29.2% | +3.3% |
| Total funding | Not published | $10.8M |
| Valuation | Not published | $21.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 469 | 7,325 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AVertto | CardiacSense |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 26/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 11/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 27/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (28/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 4/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AVertto | CardiacSense |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | AVertto | CardiacSense |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads |
“CardiacSense Ltd. CS System 3 is a wristworn medical device that measures heart rate, Pulse Rate and detects atrial fibrillation (AFib) by reading the users PPG and ECG CS322 (2A4CTCS322).”r/FCCID
AVertto vs CardiacSense: common questions
Which is better, AVertto or CardiacSense?
On our 0-100 score CardiacSense rates higher (51/100 against 26/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AVertto and CardiacSense compare on the numbers?
AVertto leads on headcount growth (+29.2% against +3.3%). CardiacSense leads on our overall score (51/100 against 26/100), domain rating (34/100 against 4/100), headcount (39 against 12), LinkedIn following (7,325 against 469).
What do real users say about AVertto and CardiacSense?
CardiacSense: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/FCCID.
Read the full AVertto review and pricing or the CardiacSense review and pricing. You can also browse other AVertto alternatives we track.