Avast vs Guard.io
Avast vs Guard.io, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Avast is on 24/100 and Guard.io on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Avast
- domain rating: 87/100 against 71/100
- funding raised: $100M against $47.0M
Guard.io
- our overall score: 63/100 against 24/100
- headcount: 152 against 5
- LinkedIn following: 21,366 against 144
At a glance
| Measure | Avast | Guard.io |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A global leader in cybersecurity, providing digital security products for consumers and businesses worldwide. | Browser security extension protecting users from phishing, scams, and malicious extensions. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Antivirus Software, Internet Security, Endpoint Security | Cybersecurity, Personal, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 1988 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Prague, Czech Republic | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Avast | Guard.io |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5 | 152 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +71.2% |
| Total funding | $100M | $47.0M |
| Latest round | Grant (prize money) | Funding Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 144 | 21,366 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Avast | Guard.io |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 24/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 27/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 15/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (54/100) | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 87/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Avast | Guard.io |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
Avast vs Guard.io: common questions
Which is better, Avast or Guard.io?
On our 0-100 score Guard.io rates higher (63/100 against 24/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Avast and Guard.io compare on the numbers?
Avast leads on domain rating (87/100 against 71/100), funding raised ($100M against $47.0M). Guard.io leads on our overall score (63/100 against 24/100), headcount (152 against 5), LinkedIn following (21,366 against 144).
Read the full Avast review and pricing or the Guard.io review and pricing. You can also browse other Avast alternatives we track.