Avanan vs ML Dome
Avanan vs ML Dome, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Avanan is on 64/100 and ML Dome on 29/100.
Where each one leads
Avanan
- our overall score: 64/100 against 29/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 74 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 11,141 against 23
ML Dome
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Avanan | ML Dome |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Avanan provides cloud email and collaboration security, stopping advanced attacks that evade traditional security tools. | Cloud-based email security protecting Gmail and Office 365 from business email compromise. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Phishing, Email Security | Cybersecurity, Email Security, Threat Detection, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Avanan | ML Dome |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 74 | 2 |
| Total funding | $69.4M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| Valuation | $100M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 11,141 | 23 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Avanan | ML Dome |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 29/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 5/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 17/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (66/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Avanan | ML Dome |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Fastly |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Drift | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Avanan | ML Dome |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 4 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“Right now I’m leaning toward Avanan. The UI is really clean, setup was super easy, and it feels like it would make my day-to-day admin work a lot easier compared to the others. That said, I don’t want”r/sysadmin
Avanan vs ML Dome: common questions
Which is better, Avanan or ML Dome?
On our 0-100 score Avanan rates higher (64/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Avanan and ML Dome compare on the numbers?
Avanan leads on our overall score (64/100 against 29/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 21/100), headcount (74 against 2), LinkedIn following (11,141 against 23).
What do real users say about Avanan and ML Dome?
Avanan: 1 positive and 4 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/sysadmin.
Read the full Avanan review and pricing or the ML Dome review and pricing. You can also browse other Avanan alternatives we track.