Autotask vs Intapp
Autotask vs Intapp, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Autotask is on 55/100 and Intapp on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Autotask
- domain rating: 79/100 against 71/100
- LinkedIn following: 61,363 against 37,168
Intapp
- our overall score: 70/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 1,363 against 626
- funding raised: $200M against $5.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Autotask | Intapp |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developed and offered hosted IT business management software for IT service providers. | Cloud software for professional services firms to manage client relationships and business development. |
| Category | IT Service Management, Business Process Automation, Customer Relationship Management, Field Service Management | Enterprise Software, Vertical SaaS, LegalTech, Accounting Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2001 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | East Greenbush, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Autotask | Intapp |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 626 | 1,363 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -25.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $5.0M | $200M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 61,363 | 37,168 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Autotask | Intapp |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | 48/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 82/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Autotask | Intapp |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk, HubSpot |
Autotask vs Intapp: common questions
Which is better, Autotask or Intapp?
On our 0-100 score Intapp rates higher (70/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Autotask and Intapp compare on the numbers?
Autotask leads on domain rating (79/100 against 71/100), LinkedIn following (61,363 against 37,168). Intapp leads on our overall score (70/100 against 55/100), headcount (1,363 against 626), funding raised ($200M against $5.0M).
Read the full Autotask review and pricing or the Intapp review and pricing. You can also browse other Autotask alternatives we track.