Autotask vs Failsim
Autotask vs Failsim, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Autotask is on 55/100 and Failsim on 10/100.
Where each one leads
Autotask
- our overall score: 55/100 against 10/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 29/100
- LinkedIn following: 61,363 against 621
Failsim
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Autotask | Failsim |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developed and offered hosted IT business management software for IT service providers. | An ITIL 4-aligned incident response training platform for IT teams. |
| Category | IT Service Management, Business Process Automation, Customer Relationship Management, Field Service Management | IT Service Management, ITIL, Incident Response, Training Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2001 | Not published |
| Headquarters | East Greenbush, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Autotask | Failsim |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 626 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -25.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $5.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 61,363 | 621 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Autotask | Failsim |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 10/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (29/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Autotask | Failsim |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Fastly |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Autotask vs Failsim: common questions
Which is better, Autotask or Failsim?
On our 0-100 score Autotask rates higher (55/100 against 10/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Autotask and Failsim compare on the numbers?
Autotask leads on our overall score (55/100 against 10/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 29/100), LinkedIn following (61,363 against 621).
Read the full Autotask review and pricing or the Failsim review and pricing. You can also browse other Autotask alternatives we track.