Autotalks vs Celeno
Autotalks vs Celeno, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Autotalks is on 62/100 and Celeno on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Autotalks
- our overall score: 62/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 86/100 against 32/100
- LinkedIn following: 11,098 against 3,198
Celeno
- agent readiness: 33/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 127 against 52
- funding raised: $100M against $75.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Autotalks | Celeno |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Qualcomm is a global leader in wireless technology innovation, developing and commercializing foundational technologies for mobile and other industries. | Provider of advanced Wi-Fi chipsets, edge software, and cloud technology for high-performance networks. |
| Category | Semiconductor, Automotive, Connected Vehicle, Chip Design | WiFi, Semiconductor, Chip Design, IoT |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2008 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | San Diego, United States | Ra'anana, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Autotalks | Celeno |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 52 | 127 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -23.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $75.0M | $100M |
| Latest round | Strategic | Series G |
| Valuation | $300M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 11,098 | 3,198 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Autotalks | Celeno |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 86/100 | 32/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Autotalks | Celeno |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Graphql | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Autotalks | Celeno |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 4 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“Qualcomm acquires Autotalks for hundreds of millions after two-year delay.”r/Israel
Autotalks vs Celeno: common questions
Which is better, Autotalks or Celeno?
On our 0-100 score Autotalks rates higher (62/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Autotalks and Celeno compare on the numbers?
Autotalks leads on our overall score (62/100 against 56/100), domain rating (86/100 against 32/100), LinkedIn following (11,098 against 3,198). Celeno leads on agent readiness (33/100 against 21/100), headcount (127 against 52), funding raised ($100M against $75.0M).
What do real users say about Autotalks and Celeno?
Autotalks: 2 positive and 4 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Israel.
Read the full Autotalks review and pricing or the Celeno review and pricing. You can also browse other Autotalks alternatives we track.