Automattic vs Pinghost
Automattic vs Pinghost, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Automattic is on 73/100 and Pinghost on 20/100.
Where each one leads
Automattic
- our overall score: 73/100 against 20/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 21/100
Pinghost
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Automattic | Pinghost |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The company behind WordPress.com, WooCommerce, Tumblr, and Jetpack, empowering individuals and businesses to build and manage their online presence. | Pinghost provides fast, reliable hosting solutions with a focus on performance, security, and scalability for various online needs. |
| Category | Web Development, CMS, E-commerce, Open Source | Web Hosting, Cloud Hosting, Managed Hosting, DDoS Protection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2005 | Not published |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Automattic | Pinghost |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,153 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -93.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $300M | Not published |
| Valuation | $3.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 159,411 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Automattic | Pinghost |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 73/100 | 20/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 50/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 87/100 | 35/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 93/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Automattic | Pinghost |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Google Cloud |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Analytics | Segment, Jetpack Stats | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Automattic | Pinghost |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads |
“PINGHOST were first to stand on ground raised to knee height and without any rails, the crowd could get as close to the bands as in very few venues during a show. The band members even had to walk through the crowd due to a lack of backstag”r/Metalcore
Automattic vs Pinghost: common questions
Which is better, Automattic or Pinghost?
On our 0-100 score Automattic rates higher (73/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Automattic and Pinghost compare on the numbers?
Automattic leads on our overall score (73/100 against 20/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 21/100).
What do real users say about Automattic and Pinghost?
Pinghost: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Metalcore.
Read the full Automattic review and pricing or the Pinghost review and pricing. You can also browse other Automattic alternatives we track.