Automattic vs cqlsystechnologies

Automattic vs cqlsystechnologies, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Automattic is on 73/100 and cqlsystechnologies on 39/100.

Automattic logo
AutomatticThe company behind WordPress.com, WooCommerce, Tumblr, and Jetpack, empowering individuals and businesses to build and manage their online presence.
Try Automattic
cqlsystechnologies logo
cqlsystechnologiesCQLSYS Technologies is a software development company specializing in web and mobile application development, digital marketing, and IT consulting.
Try cqlsystechnologies

Where each one leads

Automattic

  • our overall score: 73/100 against 39/100
  • domain rating: 93/100 against 35/100
  • funding raised: $300M against $125M

cqlsystechnologies

Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.

At a glance

MeasureAutomatticcqlsystechnologies
What it isThe company behind WordPress.com, WooCommerce, Tumblr, and Jetpack, empowering individuals and businesses to build and manage their online presence.CQLSYS Technologies is a software development company specializing in web and mobile application development, digital marketing, and IT consulting.
CategoryWeb Development, CMS, E-commerce, Open SourceWeb Development, Mobile App Development, E-commerce Solutions, Digital Marketing
Sells toBusiness modelB2BB2B
OfferingPlatformServices
Founded2005Not published
HeadquartersSan Francisco, United StatesHyderabad, India
StatusActiveActive

Size, funding and growth

MeasureAutomatticcqlsystechnologies
Employees2,153Not published
Headcount growthLast 12 months-93.2%Not published
Total funding$300M$125M
Valuation$3.0BNot published
LinkedIn followers159,411Not published

StartupHub scores

Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.

MeasureAutomatticcqlsystechnologies
StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating73/10039/100
Traction60/10040/100
Team50/100Not published
Community8/100Not published
Search visibility44/1004/100
Quality87/10050/100
Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the siteD (49/100)D (51/100)
Domain ratingLink authority, 0-10093/10035/100

Technology

Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.

MeasureAutomatticcqlsystechnologies
HostingSelf ManagedAWS
CMSWordPressNot detected
FrameworksNot detectedJquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap
AnalyticsSegment, Jetpack StatsGoogle Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity
Support stackNot detectedCrisp
Open sourceYesNo
Self-hostableYesNo

Automattic vs cqlsystechnologies: common questions

Which is better, Automattic or cqlsystechnologies?

On our 0-100 score Automattic rates higher (73/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.

How do Automattic and cqlsystechnologies compare on the numbers?

Automattic leads on our overall score (73/100 against 39/100), domain rating (93/100 against 35/100), funding raised ($300M against $125M).

Read the full Automattic review and pricing or the cqlsystechnologies review and pricing. You can also browse other Automattic alternatives we track.