Automata Network vs StarkWare
Automata Network vs StarkWare, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Automata Network is on 38/100 and StarkWare on 73/100.
Where each one leads
Automata Network
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
StarkWare
- our overall score: 73/100 against 38/100
- agent readiness: 30/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 56/100
- funding raised: $180M against $1.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Automata Network | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Decentralized middleware protocol providing verifiable off-chain computation and privacy services for Web3 applications. | Develops blockchain scaling solutions using STARK technology for Ethereum-secure, fast, and seamless user experiences. |
| Category | Blockchain, Web3, Privacy, Cybersecurity | Blockchain, NFT, Crypto, Cryptocurrency |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Singapore, Singapore | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Automata Network | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 194 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +15.6% |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $180M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $8.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 20,607 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Automata Network | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 38/100 | 73/100 |
| Traction | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 52/100 | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 56/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Automata Network | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Not detected | Walletconnect |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Automata Network vs StarkWare: common questions
Which is better, Automata Network or StarkWare?
On our 0-100 score StarkWare rates higher (73/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Automata Network and StarkWare compare on the numbers?
StarkWare leads on our overall score (73/100 against 38/100), agent readiness (30/100 against 25/100), domain rating (71/100 against 56/100), funding raised ($180M against $1.0M).
Read the full Automata Network review and pricing or the StarkWare review and pricing. You can also browse other Automata Network alternatives we track.