Automata Network vs QED-it
Automata Network vs QED-it, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Automata Network is on 38/100 and QED-it on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Automata Network
- domain rating: 56/100 against 40/100
QED-it
- our overall score: 47/100 against 38/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 25/100
- funding raised: $13.0M against $1.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Automata Network | QED-it |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Decentralized middleware protocol providing verifiable off-chain computation and privacy services for Web3 applications. | Enterprise privacy platform using zero-knowledge proofs to enable secure, confidential data collaboration on blockchains. |
| Category | Blockchain, Web3, Privacy, Cybersecurity | Blockchain, Privacy, Security, Enterprise Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Singapore, Singapore | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Automata Network | QED-it |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 11 |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $13.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Automata Network | QED-it |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 38/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 30/100 | 46/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 10/100 |
| Quality | 52/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 56/100 | 40/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Automata Network | QED-it |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Automata Network vs QED-it: common questions
Which is better, Automata Network or QED-it?
On our 0-100 score QED-it rates higher (47/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Automata Network and QED-it compare on the numbers?
Automata Network leads on domain rating (56/100 against 40/100). QED-it leads on our overall score (47/100 against 38/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 25/100), funding raised ($13.0M against $1.0M).
Read the full Automata Network review and pricing or the QED-it review and pricing. You can also browse other Automata Network alternatives we track.