AutoGPT vs Mastra
AutoGPT vs Mastra, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AutoGPT is on 58/100 and Mastra on 77/100.
Where each one leads
AutoGPT
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Mastra
- our overall score: 77/100 against 58/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 63/100
- headcount: 53 against 10
- funding raised: $35.5M against $12.0M
- LinkedIn following: 6,591 against 1,029
At a glance
| Measure | AutoGPT | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AutoGPT is a platform that empowers users to create intelligent, autonomous AI agents to streamline digital workflows and automate complex tasks, amplifying human potential. | An open-source TypeScript/JavaScript framework for building AI agents, from the creators of Gatsby. |
| Category | Agentic AI | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Developer Tools, Open Source |
| Sells toBusiness model | Not published | B2B |
| Offering | Not published | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | Edinburgh, United Kingdom | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AutoGPT | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 10 | 53 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +204.5% |
| Total funding | $12.0M | $35.5M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,029 | 6,591 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AutoGPT | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 77/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 70/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | 3/100 | 38/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 68/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (57/100) | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 63/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AutoGPT | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | No | Yes, 15,100 GitHub stars |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | AutoGPT | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Seamless Integration & Low-Code Workflows, Autonomous Operation with Continuous Agents, Intelligent Automation for Maximum Efficiency, Agent Blocks for Collaborative AI, Credit and Token Usage Tracking, Support for Advanced LLMs | AI Agent Framework, Workflows, RAG, Evals, Memory & Tool Selection, Open Source & Modular |
What users say
| Measure | AutoGPT | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 2 votes |
AutoGPT vs Mastra: common questions
Which is better, AutoGPT or Mastra?
On our 0-100 score Mastra rates higher (77/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AutoGPT and Mastra compare on the numbers?
Mastra leads on our overall score (77/100 against 58/100), domain rating (76/100 against 63/100), headcount (53 against 10), funding raised ($35.5M against $12.0M), LinkedIn following (6,591 against 1,029).
Read the full AutoGPT review and pricing or the Mastra review and pricing. You can also browse other AutoGPT alternatives we track.