AutoGPT vs Manus AI
AutoGPT vs Manus AI, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AutoGPT is on 58/100 and Manus AI on 75/100.
Where each one leads
AutoGPT
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Manus AI
- our overall score: 75/100 against 58/100
- domain rating: 87/100 against 63/100
- headcount: 137 against 10
- funding raised: $150M against $12.0M
- LinkedIn following: 124,524 against 1,029
At a glance
| Measure | AutoGPT | Manus AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AutoGPT is a platform that empowers users to create intelligent, autonomous AI agents to streamline digital workflows and automate complex tasks, amplifying human potential. | The general AI agent that turns your thoughts into actions. |
| Category | Agentic AI | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Foundation Model, Generative AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | Not published | B2B |
| Offering | Not published | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Edinburgh, United Kingdom | Singapore, Singapore |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AutoGPT | Manus AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 10 | 137 |
| Total funding | $12.0M | $150M |
| Valuation | Not published | $500M |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,029 | 124,524 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AutoGPT | Manus AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 75/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 75/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 3/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 74/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (57/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 63/100 | 87/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AutoGPT | Manus AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Plausible |
| Open source | No | Yes, 42,600 GitHub stars |
Product and pricing
| Measure | AutoGPT | Manus AI |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Seamless Integration & Low-Code Workflows, Autonomous Operation with Continuous Agents, Intelligent Automation for Maximum Efficiency, Agent Blocks for Collaborative AI, Credit and Token Usage Tracking, Support for Advanced LLMs | General AI Agent, Secure Execution, Investor-Ready Deck Generation, Wide Research Approach, Script to Storyboard Conversion, Automated Trend Monitoring |
AutoGPT vs Manus AI: common questions
Which is better, AutoGPT or Manus AI?
On our 0-100 score Manus AI rates higher (75/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AutoGPT and Manus AI compare on the numbers?
Manus AI leads on our overall score (75/100 against 58/100), domain rating (87/100 against 63/100), headcount (137 against 10), funding raised ($150M against $12.0M), LinkedIn following (124,524 against 1,029).
Read the full AutoGPT review and pricing or the Manus AI review and pricing. You can also browse other AutoGPT alternatives we track.