Auto-GPT vs Steel.dev
Auto-GPT vs Steel.dev, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Auto-GPT is on 53/100 and Steel.dev on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Auto-GPT
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 64/100 against 50/100
Steel.dev
- our overall score: 58/100 against 53/100
- funding raised: $17.0M against $12.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Auto-GPT | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source autonomous AI agent platform that automates complex digital workflows. | Cloud-based browser API for AI agents, simplifying web automation with anti-bot protection and session persistence. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Open Source, Workflow Automation | Developer Tools, API Platform, Workflow Automation, AI Agents |
| Sells toBusiness model | Open Source | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Auto-GPT | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | Not published |
| Total funding | $12.0M | $17.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 213 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Auto-GPT | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 36/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 16/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (66/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Auto-GPT | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Auto-GPT | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 3.0/5 from 1 vote |
Auto-GPT vs Steel.dev: common questions
Which is better, Auto-GPT or Steel.dev?
On our 0-100 score Steel.dev rates higher (58/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Auto-GPT and Steel.dev compare on the numbers?
Auto-GPT leads on agent readiness (66/100 against 54/100), domain rating (64/100 against 50/100). Steel.dev leads on our overall score (58/100 against 53/100), funding raised ($17.0M against $12.0M).
Read the full Auto-GPT review and pricing or the Steel.dev review and pricing. You can also browse other Auto-GPT alternatives we track.