Auto-GPT vs Mastra
Auto-GPT vs Mastra, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Auto-GPT is on 53/100 and Mastra on 76/100.
Where each one leads
Auto-GPT
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 58/100
Mastra
- our overall score: 76/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 64/100
- headcount: 53 against 2
- funding raised: $35.5M against $12.0M
- LinkedIn following: 6,591 against 213
At a glance
| Measure | Auto-GPT | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source autonomous AI agent platform that automates complex digital workflows. | An open-source TypeScript/JavaScript framework for building AI agents, from the creators of Gatsby. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Open Source, Workflow Automation | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Developer Tools, Open Source |
| Sells toBusiness model | Open Source | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Auto-GPT | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 53 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +204.5% |
| Total funding | $12.0M | $35.5M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 213 | 6,591 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Auto-GPT | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 76/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Team | Not published | 90/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 25/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 59/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (66/100) | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Auto-GPT | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | Yes | Yes, 15,100 GitHub stars |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Auto-GPT | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | AI Agent Framework, Workflows, RAG, Evals, Memory & Tool Selection, Open Source & Modular |
What users say
| Measure | Auto-GPT | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 1 vote |
Auto-GPT vs Mastra: common questions
Which is better, Auto-GPT or Mastra?
On our 0-100 score Mastra rates higher (76/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Auto-GPT and Mastra compare on the numbers?
Auto-GPT leads on agent readiness (66/100 against 58/100). Mastra leads on our overall score (76/100 against 53/100), domain rating (76/100 against 64/100), headcount (53 against 2), funding raised ($35.5M against $12.0M), LinkedIn following (6,591 against 213).
Read the full Auto-GPT review and pricing or the Mastra review and pricing. You can also browse other Auto-GPT alternatives we track.