Auto-GPT vs LangChain
Auto-GPT vs LangChain, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Auto-GPT is on 53/100 and LangChain on 76/100.
Where each one leads
Auto-GPT
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 42/100
LangChain
- our overall score: 76/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 86/100 against 64/100
- headcount: 312 against 2
- funding raised: $260M against $12.0M
- LinkedIn following: 514,641 against 213
At a glance
| Measure | Auto-GPT | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source autonomous AI agent platform that automates complex digital workflows. | The platform for building reliable AI agents and LLM applications. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Open Source, Workflow Automation | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Foundation Model, Large Language Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | Open Source | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Auto-GPT | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 312 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +260.4% |
| Total funding | $12.0M | $260M |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| Valuation | Not published | $1K |
| LinkedIn followers | 213 | 514,641 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Auto-GPT | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 76/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 84/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 83/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (66/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 86/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Auto-GPT | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Plausible |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Auto-GPT vs LangChain: common questions
Which is better, Auto-GPT or LangChain?
On our 0-100 score LangChain rates higher (76/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Auto-GPT and LangChain compare on the numbers?
Auto-GPT leads on agent readiness (66/100 against 42/100). LangChain leads on our overall score (76/100 against 53/100), domain rating (86/100 against 64/100), headcount (312 against 2), funding raised ($260M against $12.0M), LinkedIn following (514,641 against 213).
Read the full Auto-GPT review and pricing or the LangChain review and pricing. You can also browse other Auto-GPT alternatives we track.