Authomize vs WideField Security

Authomize vs WideField Security, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Authomize is on 59/100 and WideField Security on 50/100.

Authomize logo
AuthomizeIdentity-first security platform for detecting and responding to identity and access threats.
Try Authomize
WideField SecurityExtends identity security platform to cover autonomous AI agents.
Try WideField Security

Where each one leads

Authomize

  • our overall score: 59/100 against 50/100
  • agent readiness: 50/100 against 35/100
  • domain rating: 78/100 against 0/100
  • funding raised: $42.0M against $14.3M

WideField Security

Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.

At a glance

MeasureAuthomizeWideField Security
What it isIdentity-first security platform for detecting and responding to identity and access threats.Extends identity security platform to cover autonomous AI agents.
CategoryCybersecurity, Enterprise, Identity Management, Information Technology (IT)Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Identity Management, Agentic AI
Sells toBusiness modelB2BB2B
OfferingSoftwarePlatform
Founded20192023
HeadquartersTel Aviv, IsraelSunnyvale, USA
StatusActiveInactive

Size, funding and growth

MeasureAuthomizeWideField Security
Employees47Not published
Headcount growthLast 12 months-4.3%Not published
Total funding$42.0M$14.3M
Latest roundSeries BSeries A
ValuationNot published$1.1B
LinkedIn followers4,486Not published

StartupHub scores

Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.

MeasureAuthomizeWideField Security
StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating59/10050/100
Traction55/10036/100
Team90/10060/100
Search visibility33/10014/100
Quality58/10065/100
Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the siteD (50/100)F (35/100)
Domain ratingLink authority, 0-10078/1000/100

Technology

Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.

MeasureAuthomizeWideField Security
CDNCloudflareNot detected
AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerNot detected

Authomize vs WideField Security: common questions

Which is better, Authomize or WideField Security?

On our 0-100 score Authomize rates higher (59/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.

How do Authomize and WideField Security compare on the numbers?

Authomize leads on our overall score (59/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 35/100), domain rating (78/100 against 0/100), funding raised ($42.0M against $14.3M).

Read the full Authomize review and pricing or the WideField Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Authomize alternatives we track.