Austincoatings vs Stam
Austincoatings vs Stam, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Austincoatings is on 16/100 and Stam on 21/100.
Where each one leads
Austincoatings
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Stam
- our overall score: 21/100 against 16/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 26/100 against 0/100
- headcount: 56 against 14
- LinkedIn following: 1,856 against 52
At a glance
| Measure | Austincoatings | Stam |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Excellence in commercial finishes since 1959, providing professional painting and coating services. | STAM specializes in acrobatic and mountain work for buildings, operating in Toulouse and Tulle. |
| Category | Commercial Painting, Industrial Coatings, Construction Services, Building Maintenance | Construction Tech, Industrial Services, Building Maintenance, Specialty Contractors |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | Not published | 2026 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Toulouse, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Austincoatings | Stam |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 14 | 56 |
| LinkedIn followers | 52 | 1,856 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Austincoatings | Stam |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 16/100 | 21/100 |
| Traction | 12/100 | 18/100 |
| Search visibility | 12/100 | 28/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | 26/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Austincoatings | Stam |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
Austincoatings vs Stam: common questions
Which is better, Austincoatings or Stam?
On our 0-100 score Stam rates higher (21/100 against 16/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Austincoatings and Stam compare on the numbers?
Stam leads on our overall score (21/100 against 16/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 39/100), domain rating (26/100 against 0/100), headcount (56 against 14), LinkedIn following (1,856 against 52).
Read the full Austincoatings review and pricing or the Stam review and pricing. You can also browse other Austincoatings alternatives we track.