Augury vs Kando
Augury vs Kando, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Augury is on 69/100 and Kando on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Augury
- our overall score: 69/100 against 62/100
- agent readiness: 30/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 352 against 50
- headcount growth: +4.9% against -15.1%
- funding raised: $369M against $36.0M
- LinkedIn following: 95,815 against 6,902
Kando
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Augury | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Augury provides AI-driven machine health and process health solutions for manufacturers, transforming operations and enabling predictive maintenance. | Data intelligence platform leveraging real-time wastewater quality data for public health and environmental improvement. |
| Category | Industrial, Maintenance, IoT, IIoT | Industrial, Water, IoT, Sensor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2012 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Augury | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 352 | 50 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.9% | -15.1% |
| Total funding | $369M | $36.0M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series C |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 95,815 | 6,902 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Augury | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Augury | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Augury vs Kando: common questions
Which is better, Augury or Kando?
On our 0-100 score Augury rates higher (69/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Augury and Kando compare on the numbers?
Augury leads on our overall score (69/100 against 62/100), agent readiness (30/100 against 21/100), domain rating (62/100 against 31/100), headcount (352 against 50), headcount growth (+4.9% against -15.1%), funding raised ($369M against $36.0M), LinkedIn following (95,815 against 6,902).
Read the full Augury review and pricing or the Kando review and pricing. You can also browse other Augury alternatives we track.