Augury vs CartaSense
Augury vs CartaSense, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Augury is on 69/100 and CartaSense on 17/100.
Where each one leads
Augury
- our overall score: 69/100 against 17/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 4/100
- headcount: 352 against 41
CartaSense
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 30/100
At a glance
| Measure | Augury | CartaSense |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Augury provides AI-driven machine health and process health solutions for manufacturers, transforming operations and enabling predictive maintenance. | CartaSense provides a complete Industrial IoT solution for real-time monitoring of environmental conditions in logistics and supply chains. |
| Category | Industrial, Maintenance, IoT, IIoT | Industrial, IoT, Transport and Logistics, Shipping |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2012 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Augury | CartaSense |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 352 | 41 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $369M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series F | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 95,815 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Augury | CartaSense |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 17/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 16/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 4/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Augury | CartaSense |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Augury | CartaSense |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“CartaSense Ltd. O-Sensor stationary / O-Sensor mobile OSENSOR (2AAEP-OSENSOR).”r/FCCID
Augury vs CartaSense: common questions
Which is better, Augury or CartaSense?
On our 0-100 score Augury rates higher (69/100 against 17/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Augury and CartaSense compare on the numbers?
Augury leads on our overall score (69/100 against 17/100), domain rating (62/100 against 4/100), headcount (352 against 41). CartaSense leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 30/100).
What do real users say about Augury and CartaSense?
CartaSense: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/FCCID.
Read the full Augury review and pricing or the CartaSense review and pricing. You can also browse other Augury alternatives we track.