Augment vs Tulip
Augment vs Tulip, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Augment is on 41/100 and Tulip on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Augment
- funding raised: $250M against $153M
Tulip
- our overall score: 59/100 against 41/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 64/100
- headcount: 388 against 13
- LinkedIn following: 31,760 against 3,063
At a glance
| Measure | Augment | Tulip |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Augment provides a cloud-based platform for manufacturers to visualize and manage their supply chains in real-time. | Tulip provides a cloud-based platform for frontline operations, empowering manufacturers to build apps for improved quality, efficiency, and traceability. |
| Category | Supply Chain, Advanced Manufacturing, Smart Manufacturing, Digital Twin | Manufacturing, Manufacturing Software, Industrial IoT, Smart Manufacturing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Somerville, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Augment | Tulip |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 13 | 388 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +3.0% |
| Total funding | $250M | $153M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,063 | 31,760 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Augment | Tulip |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 40/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Augment | Tulip |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | CloudFront | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Plausible | Not detected |
Augment vs Tulip: common questions
Which is better, Augment or Tulip?
On our 0-100 score Tulip rates higher (59/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Augment and Tulip compare on the numbers?
Augment leads on funding raised ($250M against $153M). Tulip leads on our overall score (59/100 against 41/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 25/100), domain rating (73/100 against 64/100), headcount (388 against 13), LinkedIn following (31,760 against 3,063).
Read the full Augment review and pricing or the Tulip review and pricing. You can also browse other Augment alternatives we track.