Atomwise vs Schrödinger
Atomwise vs Schrödinger, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Atomwise is on 60/100 and Schrödinger on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Atomwise
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Schrödinger
- our overall score: 69/100 against 60/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 60/100
- headcount: 1,003 against 15
- headcount growth: -8.1% against -34.5%
- LinkedIn following: 65,181 against 24,377
At a glance
| Measure | Atomwise | Schrödinger |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Atomwise uses AI to accelerate the discovery of novel small molecule therapeutics with its AtomNet platform. | Physics-based software platform for molecular discovery and design in life and materials sciences. |
| Category | Drug Discovery, Life Sciences, Healthcare, Drug Discovery AI | Drug Discovery, Biotech, Pharmaceuticals, Materials Science |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software | services | platform |
| Founded | 2012 | 1990 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Atomwise | Schrödinger |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15 | 1,003 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -34.5% | -8.1% |
| Total funding | $176M | $220M |
| Latest round | Grant | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 24,377 | 65,181 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Atomwise | Schrödinger |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Atomwise | Schrödinger |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Jetpack Stats |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Atomwise vs Schrödinger: common questions
Which is better, Atomwise or Schrödinger?
On our 0-100 score Schrödinger rates higher (69/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Atomwise and Schrödinger compare on the numbers?
Schrödinger leads on our overall score (69/100 against 60/100), domain rating (72/100 against 60/100), headcount (1,003 against 15), headcount growth (-8.1% against -34.5%), LinkedIn following (65,181 against 24,377).
Read the full Atomwise review and pricing or the Schrödinger review and pricing. You can also browse other Atomwise alternatives we track.