Atomwise vs Phylo
Atomwise vs Phylo, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Atomwise is on 60/100 and Phylo on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Atomwise
- our overall score: 60/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 44/100
- headcount: 15 against 11
- LinkedIn following: 24,377 against 4,715
Phylo
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Atomwise | Phylo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Atomwise uses AI to accelerate the discovery of novel small molecule therapeutics with its AtomNet platform. | AI-powered platform for accelerating phylogenetic analysis and evolutionary biology research. |
| Category | Drug Discovery, Life Sciences, Healthcare, Drug Discovery AI | BIO + LIFE SCIENCES, Biotech, Genomics, AI-Driven Protein Design |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Cambridge, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Atomwise | Phylo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15 | 11 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -34.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $176M | Not published |
| Latest round | Grant | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 24,377 | 4,715 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Atomwise | Phylo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 11/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 44/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Atomwise | Phylo |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Framer |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Atomwise vs Phylo: common questions
Which is better, Atomwise or Phylo?
On our 0-100 score Atomwise rates higher (60/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Atomwise and Phylo compare on the numbers?
Atomwise leads on our overall score (60/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 38/100), domain rating (59/100 against 44/100), headcount (15 against 11), LinkedIn following (24,377 against 4,715).
Read the full Atomwise review and pricing or the Phylo review and pricing. You can also browse other Atomwise alternatives we track.