Atomic Industries vs Covariant
Atomic Industries vs Covariant, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Atomic Industries is on 33/100 and Covariant on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Atomic Industries
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 23/100
Covariant
- our overall score: 61/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 60/100 against 7/100
- funding raised: $80.0M against $62.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Atomic Industries | Covariant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Atomic Industries is a robotics startup focused on developing sophisticated automation systems and intelligent robots for complex tasks. | Covariant builds a universal AI platform, the Covariant Brain, to enable robots to see, reason, and act autonomously in dynamic real-world environments like warehouses. |
| Category | Robotics, Industrial Robotics, Automation, Hardware | Robotics, Industrial Robotics, Warehouse Robotics, Computer Vision |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Emeryville, United States |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Atomic Industries | Covariant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 43 |
| Total funding | $62.0M | $80.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 27,403 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Atomic Industries | Covariant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 33/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 39/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 6/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (23/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 7/100 | 60/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Atomic Industries | Covariant |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Netlify |
| CDN | Not detected | Netlify |
Atomic Industries vs Covariant: common questions
Which is better, Atomic Industries or Covariant?
On our 0-100 score Covariant rates higher (61/100 against 33/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Atomic Industries and Covariant compare on the numbers?
Atomic Industries leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 23/100). Covariant leads on our overall score (61/100 against 33/100), domain rating (60/100 against 7/100), funding raised ($80.0M against $62.0M).
Read the full Atomic Industries review and pricing or the Covariant review and pricing. You can also browse other Atomic Industries alternatives we track.