Atom Security vs Checkmarx
Atom Security vs Checkmarx, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Atom Security is on 33/100 and Checkmarx on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Atom Security
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Checkmarx
- our overall score: 63/100 against 33/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 77/100 against 3/100
- headcount: 1,005 against 2
- headcount growth: +3.6% against -15.7%
- LinkedIn following: 128,709 against 93
At a glance
| Measure | Atom Security | Checkmarx |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybersecurity startup reducing AppSec noise by 80% with its noise-reduction platform. | Leading application security provider with a comprehensive cloud-native platform for securing development lifecycles. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, AppSec, Threat Detection, Developer Tools | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, DevSecOps, Application Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Atom Security | Checkmarx |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 1,005 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -15.7% | +3.6% |
| Total funding | Not published | $14.5M |
| Latest round | Bootstrapped | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $120M |
| LinkedIn followers | 93 | 128,709 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Atom Security | Checkmarx |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 33/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 5/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 3/100 | 77/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Atom Security | Checkmarx |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Segment, Microsoft Clarity, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Not detected | Discourse |
Atom Security vs Checkmarx: common questions
Which is better, Atom Security or Checkmarx?
On our 0-100 score Checkmarx rates higher (63/100 against 33/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Atom Security and Checkmarx compare on the numbers?
Checkmarx leads on our overall score (63/100 against 33/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 21/100), domain rating (77/100 against 3/100), headcount (1,005 against 2), headcount growth (+3.6% against -15.7%), LinkedIn following (128,709 against 93).
Read the full Atom Security review and pricing or the Checkmarx review and pricing. You can also browse other Atom Security alternatives we track.