Atom Computing vs Rigetti Computing
Atom Computing vs Rigetti Computing, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Atom Computing is on 63/100 and Rigetti Computing on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Atom Computing
- our overall score: 63/100 against 59/100
- funding raised: $428M against $178M
Rigetti Computing
- domain rating: 71/100 against 0/100
- headcount: 186 against 123
- LinkedIn following: 49,076 against 21,437
At a glance
| Measure | Atom Computing | Rigetti Computing |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing fault-tolerant quantum computers. | Designs, manufactures, and deploys superconducting quantum computers and processors. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, AI Hardware | Quantum Computing, AI Hardware, Semiconductor, Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware, software, platform, services |
| Founded | 2021 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Boulder, USA | Berkeley, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Atom Computing | Rigetti Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 123 | 186 |
| Total funding | $428M | $178M |
| Latest round | Series C | Grant |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 21,437 | 49,076 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Atom Computing | Rigetti Computing |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 50/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 78/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | Not published | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Atom Computing | Rigetti Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Atom Computing | Rigetti Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 4 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“Atom Computing presents what they call "the first complete demonstration of quantum error correction with neutral atom qubits" featuring many rounds of syndrome extraction for toric codes with mid-circuit measurement and real-time reloading”r/QuantumComputing
Atom Computing vs Rigetti Computing: common questions
Which is better, Atom Computing or Rigetti Computing?
On our 0-100 score Atom Computing rates higher (63/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Atom Computing and Rigetti Computing compare on the numbers?
Atom Computing leads on our overall score (63/100 against 59/100), funding raised ($428M against $178M). Rigetti Computing leads on domain rating (71/100 against 0/100), headcount (186 against 123), LinkedIn following (49,076 against 21,437).
What do real users say about Atom Computing and Rigetti Computing?
Atom Computing: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/QuantumComputing.
Read the full Atom Computing review and pricing or the Rigetti Computing review and pricing. You can also browse other Atom Computing alternatives we track.