Atom Computing vs Quantum Source Labs
Atom Computing vs Quantum Source Labs, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Atom Computing is on 63/100 and Quantum Source Labs on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Atom Computing
- headcount: 123 against 66
- funding raised: $428M against $78.5M
- LinkedIn following: 21,437 against 7,621
Quantum Source Labs
- domain rating: 31/100 against 0/100
At a glance
| Measure | Atom Computing | Quantum Source Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing fault-tolerant quantum computers. | Developing practical photonic quantum computers using a novel photon-atom gate architecture. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, AI Hardware | Quantum Computing, Quantum Hardware, Quantum Software, AI Hardware & Chips |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware | software | platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Boulder, USA | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Atom Computing | Quantum Source Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 123 | 66 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +36.1% |
| Total funding | $428M | $78.5M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 21,437 | 7,621 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Atom Computing | Quantum Source Labs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 78/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | Not published | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Atom Computing | Quantum Source Labs |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
What users say
| Measure | Atom Computing | Quantum Source Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 4 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“Atom Computing presents what they call "the first complete demonstration of quantum error correction with neutral atom qubits" featuring many rounds of syndrome extraction for toric codes with mid-circuit measurement and real-time reloading”r/QuantumComputing
Atom Computing vs Quantum Source Labs: common questions
Which is better, Atom Computing or Quantum Source Labs?
Both score the same on our 0-100 rating, so the choice comes down to the 15 data points in the tables above rather than overall company strength.
How do Atom Computing and Quantum Source Labs compare on the numbers?
Atom Computing leads on headcount (123 against 66), funding raised ($428M against $78.5M), LinkedIn following (21,437 against 7,621). Quantum Source Labs leads on domain rating (31/100 against 0/100).
What do real users say about Atom Computing and Quantum Source Labs?
Atom Computing: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/QuantumComputing.
Read the full Atom Computing review and pricing or the Quantum Source Labs review and pricing. You can also browse other Atom Computing alternatives we track.