Atom Computing vs QBLOX
Atom Computing vs QBLOX, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Atom Computing is on 63/100 and QBLOX on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Atom Computing
- funding raised: $428M against $26.0M
- LinkedIn following: 21,437 against 15,366
QBLOX
- domain rating: 47/100 against 0/100
- headcount: 183 against 123
At a glance
| Measure | Atom Computing | QBLOX |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing fault-tolerant quantum computers. | Qblox provides modular hardware and software solutions for scalable quantum computer control. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, AI Hardware | Quantum Computing, Quantum Hardware, Quantum Control Systems, Quantum Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2021 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Boulder, USA | Delft, Netherlands |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Atom Computing | QBLOX |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 123 | 183 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +9.7% |
| Total funding | $428M | $26.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 21,437 | 15,366 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Atom Computing | QBLOX |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | Not published |
| Team | Not published | 24/100 |
| Search visibility | 78/100 | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | Not published | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Atom Computing | QBLOX |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Atom Computing | QBLOX |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 4 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“Atom Computing presents what they call "the first complete demonstration of quantum error correction with neutral atom qubits" featuring many rounds of syndrome extraction for toric codes with mid-circuit measurement and real-time reloading”r/QuantumComputing
Atom Computing vs QBLOX: common questions
Which is better, Atom Computing or QBLOX?
On our 0-100 score Atom Computing rates higher (63/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Atom Computing and QBLOX compare on the numbers?
Atom Computing leads on funding raised ($428M against $26.0M), LinkedIn following (21,437 against 15,366). QBLOX leads on domain rating (47/100 against 0/100), headcount (183 against 123).
What do real users say about Atom Computing and QBLOX?
Atom Computing: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/QuantumComputing.
Read the full Atom Computing review and pricing or the QBLOX review and pricing. You can also browse other Atom Computing alternatives we track.