Atom Computing vs Q-Factor
Atom Computing vs Q-Factor, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Atom Computing is on 63/100 and Q-Factor on 43/100.
Where each one leads
Atom Computing
- our overall score: 63/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 123 against 13
- funding raised: $428M against $24.0M
- LinkedIn following: 21,437 against 1,182
Q-Factor
- domain rating: 2/100 against 0/100
At a glance
| Measure | Atom Computing | Q-Factor |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing fault-tolerant quantum computers. | Q-Factor is a quantum computing startup developing a neutral atom-based quantum computer architecture designed to scale to one million qubits and beyond. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, AI Hardware | Quantum Computing, AI Hardware, Microelectronics & Photonics Solutions, Deep Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2021 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | Boulder, USA | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Atom Computing | Q-Factor |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 123 | 13 |
| Total funding | $428M | $24.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 21,437 | 1,182 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Atom Computing | Q-Factor |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 43/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 48/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 78/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 50/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | Not published | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | 2/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Atom Computing | Q-Factor |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Lovable |
What users say
| Measure | Atom Computing | Q-Factor |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 4 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“Atom Computing presents what they call "the first complete demonstration of quantum error correction with neutral atom qubits" featuring many rounds of syndrome extraction for toric codes with mid-circuit measurement and real-time reloading”r/QuantumComputing
Atom Computing vs Q-Factor: common questions
Which is better, Atom Computing or Q-Factor?
On our 0-100 score Atom Computing rates higher (63/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Atom Computing and Q-Factor compare on the numbers?
Atom Computing leads on our overall score (63/100 against 43/100), headcount (123 against 13), funding raised ($428M against $24.0M), LinkedIn following (21,437 against 1,182). Q-Factor leads on domain rating (2/100 against 0/100).
What do real users say about Atom Computing and Q-Factor?
Atom Computing: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/QuantumComputing.
Read the full Atom Computing review and pricing or the Q-Factor review and pricing. You can also browse other Atom Computing alternatives we track.