Atom Computing vs Phasecraft
Atom Computing vs Phasecraft, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Atom Computing is on 63/100 and Phasecraft on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Atom Computing
- our overall score: 63/100 against 57/100
- funding raised: $428M against $99.4M
Phasecraft
- domain rating: 44/100 against 0/100
At a glance
| Measure | Atom Computing | Phasecraft |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing fault-tolerant quantum computers. | Quantum computing software company developing tools for fault-tolerant quantum computers. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, AI Hardware | Quantum Computing, Quantum Software, Foundation Model, AI Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Boulder, USA | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Atom Computing | Phasecraft |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 123 | Not published |
| Total funding | $428M | $99.4M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 21,437 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Atom Computing | Phasecraft |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 78/100 | 3/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | Not published | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | 44/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Atom Computing | Phasecraft |
|---|---|---|
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
What users say
| Measure | Atom Computing | Phasecraft |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 4 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“Atom Computing presents what they call "the first complete demonstration of quantum error correction with neutral atom qubits" featuring many rounds of syndrome extraction for toric codes with mid-circuit measurement and real-time reloading”r/QuantumComputing
Atom Computing vs Phasecraft: common questions
Which is better, Atom Computing or Phasecraft?
On our 0-100 score Atom Computing rates higher (63/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Atom Computing and Phasecraft compare on the numbers?
Atom Computing leads on our overall score (63/100 against 57/100), funding raised ($428M against $99.4M). Phasecraft leads on domain rating (44/100 against 0/100).
What do real users say about Atom Computing and Phasecraft?
Atom Computing: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/QuantumComputing.
Read the full Atom Computing review and pricing or the Phasecraft review and pricing. You can also browse other Atom Computing alternatives we track.