ATLASense Biomed vs Heramed
ATLASense Biomed vs Heramed, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ATLASense Biomed is on 30/100 and Heramed on 46/100.
Where each one leads
ATLASense Biomed
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Heramed
- our overall score: 46/100 against 30/100
- agent readiness: 37/100 against 26/100
- domain rating: 34/100 against 7/100
- headcount: 18 against 11
- LinkedIn following: 2,094 against 897
At a glance
| Measure | ATLASense Biomed | Heramed |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops a wearable device for continuous, non-invasive monitoring of vital signs for remote patient care. | HeraMED develops innovative connected pregnancy monitoring solutions, empowering women with medical-grade fetal monitoring for home use. |
| Category | Healthcare, Monitor, HealthTech, MedTech | Healthcare, Monitor, Pregnancy, MedTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2014 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Netanya, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ATLASense Biomed | Heramed |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 11 | 18 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -2.4% |
| Total funding | Not published | $600K |
| Latest round | Bootstrapped | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 897 | 2,094 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ATLASense Biomed | Heramed |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 30/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 11/100 | 42/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (26/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 7/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ATLASense Biomed | Heramed |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
ATLASense Biomed vs Heramed: common questions
Which is better, ATLASense Biomed or Heramed?
On our 0-100 score Heramed rates higher (46/100 against 30/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ATLASense Biomed and Heramed compare on the numbers?
Heramed leads on our overall score (46/100 against 30/100), agent readiness (37/100 against 26/100), domain rating (34/100 against 7/100), headcount (18 against 11), LinkedIn following (2,094 against 897).
Read the full ATLASense Biomed review and pricing or the Heramed review and pricing. You can also browse other ATLASense Biomed alternatives we track.