Atidot vs Planck
Atidot vs Planck, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Atidot is on 53/100 and Planck on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Atidot
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Planck
- our overall score: 65/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 45/100 against 38/100
- headcount: 75 against 17
- headcount growth: -7.5% against -14.3%
- funding raised: $71.0M against $15.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Atidot | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI cloud platform for life insurance, enhancing customer lifetime value and revenue. | Commercial insurance data platform enabling instant and accurate business underwriting. |
| Category | Fintech, Insurance, Insurance Risk, Analytics | Fintech, Insurance, Underwriting, InsurTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Atidot | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 17 | 75 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -14.3% | -7.5% |
| Total funding | $15.0M | $71.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $250M |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,519 | 6,433 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Atidot | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 45/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Atidot | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Framer |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Atidot vs Planck: common questions
Which is better, Atidot or Planck?
On our 0-100 score Planck rates higher (65/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Atidot and Planck compare on the numbers?
Planck leads on our overall score (65/100 against 53/100), domain rating (45/100 against 38/100), headcount (75 against 17), headcount growth (-7.5% against -14.3%), funding raised ($71.0M against $15.0M).
Read the full Atidot review and pricing or the Planck review and pricing. You can also browse other Atidot alternatives we track.