Atauro vs Track160
Atauro vs Track160, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Atauro is on 7/100 and Track160 on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Atauro
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 21/100
Track160
- our overall score: 52/100 against 7/100
- domain rating: 29/100 against 10/100
At a glance
| Measure | Atauro | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provides accurate football betting odds and in-depth analysis from over 100 experts. | Automated FIFA EPTS certified football data analytics platform for clubs and leagues. |
| Category | Sports Betting, Football Analytics, Odds Provider, Sports Information | Sports, Analytics, Video, Data |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Atauro | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 34 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -29.6% |
| Total funding | Not published | $5.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 3,875 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Atauro | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 7/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 49/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 10/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Atauro | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
Atauro vs Track160: common questions
Which is better, Atauro or Track160?
On our 0-100 score Track160 rates higher (52/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Atauro and Track160 compare on the numbers?
Atauro leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 21/100). Track160 leads on our overall score (52/100 against 7/100), domain rating (29/100 against 10/100).
Read the full Atauro review and pricing or the Track160 review and pricing. You can also browse other Atauro alternatives we track.