At-Bay vs U-BX Technology
At-Bay vs U-BX Technology, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and U-BX Technology on 53/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 53/100
- funding raised: $292M against $10.0M
U-BX Technology
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | U-BX Technology |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | AI-driven value-added services for the insurance industry in China. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | InsurTech, AI, Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Beijing, China |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | U-BX Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | IPO |
| Valuation | $1.4B | $111M |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | U-BX Technology |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 35/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 10/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | U-BX Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs U-BX Technology: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or U-BX Technology?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and U-BX Technology compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 53/100), funding raised ($292M against $10.0M).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the U-BX Technology review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.