At-Bay vs Sedgwick
At-Bay vs Sedgwick, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and Sedgwick on 69/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 42/100
- LinkedIn following: 20,419 against 637
Sedgwick
- domain rating: 76/100 against 62/100
- headcount: 22,509 against 359
- funding raised: $1.0B against $292M
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | Sedgwick |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | Global provider of claims management, loss adjusting, and technology-enabled business solutions. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | Claims Management, Loss Adjusting, Risk Management, Benefits Administration |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2016 | 1969 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Memphis, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | Sedgwick |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | 22,509 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | $1.0B |
| Latest round | Series D | Private Equity |
| Valuation | $1.4B | $13B |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | 637 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | Sedgwick |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 89/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | Sedgwick |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Google Tag Manager, Fathom |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
At-Bay vs Sedgwick: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or Sedgwick?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 69/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and Sedgwick compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 42/100), LinkedIn following (20,419 against 637). Sedgwick leads on domain rating (76/100 against 62/100), headcount (22,509 against 359), funding raised ($1.0B against $292M).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the Sedgwick review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.