At-Bay vs SageSure
At-Bay vs SageSure, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and SageSure on 57/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 42/100
SageSure
- headcount: 1,000 against 359
- LinkedIn following: 26,642 against 20,419
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | SageSure |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | Managing general underwriter providing specialized property insurance solutions for catastrophe-exposed markets in the US. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | InsurTech, Insurance, Financial Services, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B2C |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Jersey City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | SageSure |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | 1,000 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | $320M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series D |
| Valuation | $1.4B | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | 26,642 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | SageSure |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | SageSure |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs SageSure: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or SageSure?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and SageSure compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 42/100). SageSure leads on headcount (1,000 against 359), LinkedIn following (26,642 against 20,419).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the SageSure review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.