At-Bay vs RockRose Risk
At-Bay vs RockRose Risk, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and RockRose Risk on Not scored yet.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- headcount: 359 against 14
- funding raised: $292M against $12.5M
- LinkedIn following: 20,419 against 512
RockRose Risk
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | RockRose Risk |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | Insurance brokerage giving property owners discounts for wildfire mitigation, evolving into a vertically integrated risk manager combining autonomous property intelligence with insurance solutions. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | InsurTech, Climate Tech, Real Estate, Risk Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Napa, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | RockRose Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | 14 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | $12.5M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | 512 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | RockRose Risk |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | Not published |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | RockRose Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs RockRose Risk: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or RockRose Risk?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against Not scored yet). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and RockRose Risk compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on headcount (359 against 14), funding raised ($292M against $12.5M), LinkedIn following (20,419 against 512).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the RockRose Risk review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.