At-Bay vs RMS (Risk Management Solutions)
At-Bay vs RMS (Risk Management Solutions), compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and RMS (Risk Management Solutions) on Not scored yet.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 22/100
RMS (Risk Management Solutions)
- domain rating: 70/100 against 62/100
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | RMS (Risk Management Solutions) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | RMS is a leading provider of catastrophe risk modeling and analytics for the insurance and financial industries. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | InsurTech, Risk Management, Catastrophe Modeling, Financial Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software | platform | services |
| Founded | 2016 | 1988 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Newark, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | RMS (Risk Management Solutions) |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | RMS (Risk Management Solutions) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | Not published |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | RMS (Risk Management Solutions) |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs RMS (Risk Management Solutions): common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or RMS (Risk Management Solutions)?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against Not scored yet). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and RMS (Risk Management Solutions) compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 22/100). RMS (Risk Management Solutions) leads on domain rating (70/100 against 62/100).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the RMS (Risk Management Solutions) review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.