At-Bay vs Ripjar
At-Bay vs Ripjar, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and Ripjar on 62/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 62/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 42/100
- headcount: 359 against 105
- LinkedIn following: 20,419 against 14,148
Ripjar
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | Ripjar |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | Smarter screening solutions provider. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | Financial Technology, Artificial Intelligence, RegTech, Cybersecurity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Cheltenham, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | Ripjar |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | 105 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | 14,148 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | Ripjar |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 56/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | Ripjar |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs Ripjar: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or Ripjar?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and Ripjar compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 62/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 42/100), headcount (359 against 105), LinkedIn following (20,419 against 14,148).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the Ripjar review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.