At-Bay vs Qumis
At-Bay vs Qumis, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and Qumis on 55/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 61/100 against 3/100
- headcount: 359 against 18
- funding raised: $292M against $9.0M
- LinkedIn following: 20,419 against 1,647
Qumis
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | Qumis |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | AI-powered platform for analyzing commercial insurance policies with attorney-grade accuracy. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | InsurTech, LegalTech, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance, Workflow Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | Qumis |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | 18 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | $9.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | 1,647 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | Qumis |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 3/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | Qumis |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Netlify |
| CDN | Not detected | Netlify |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, PostHog |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs Qumis: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or Qumis?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and Qumis compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 41/100), domain rating (61/100 against 3/100), headcount (359 against 18), funding raised ($292M against $9.0M), LinkedIn following (20,419 against 1,647).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the Qumis review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.