At-Bay vs Mount
At-Bay vs Mount, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and Mount on 33/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 15/100
- headcount: 359 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 20,419 against 102
Mount
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | Mount |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | Mount provides insurance and security for AI agents, assessing risk and offering instant coverage. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | InsurTech, AI Agent, Agentic AI, AI Safety |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | Mount |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | 102 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | Mount |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 33/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 5/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 3/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 15/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | Mount |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Framer |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs Mount: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or Mount?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 33/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and Mount compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 33/100), domain rating (62/100 against 15/100), headcount (359 against 2), LinkedIn following (20,419 against 102).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the Mount review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.