At-Bay vs Hellas Direct
At-Bay vs Hellas Direct, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and Hellas Direct on 48/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 48/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 61/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 359 against 280
Hellas Direct
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | Hellas Direct |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | A tech-driven insurance company offering flexible and affordable insurance products in Greece. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | InsurTech, Parametric Insurance, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance, Digital Payments |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Athens, Greece |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | Hellas Direct |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | 280 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | 21,186 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | Hellas Direct |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 43/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | Hellas Direct |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
At-Bay vs Hellas Direct: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or Hellas Direct?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and Hellas Direct compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 48/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 41/100), domain rating (61/100 against 43/100), headcount (359 against 280).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the Hellas Direct review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.