At-Bay vs Guardio Ltd
At-Bay vs Guardio Ltd, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and Guardio Ltd on 37/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 37/100
Guardio Ltd
- agent readiness: 71/100 against 48/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 61/100
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | Guardio Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | Company |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | Cybersecurity, Endpoint Security, Threat Detection, Browser Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | Guardio Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | Guardio Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 37/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | 10/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 16/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | B (71/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | Guardio Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Google Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs Guardio Ltd: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or Guardio Ltd?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 37/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and Guardio Ltd compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 37/100). Guardio Ltd leads on agent readiness (71/100 against 48/100), domain rating (72/100 against 61/100).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the Guardio Ltd review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.