At-Bay vs Gradientcode
At-Bay vs Gradientcode, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and Gradientcode on 12/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 12/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 39/100
- LinkedIn following: 20,419 against 2,572
Gradientcode
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | Gradientcode |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | AI-enabled decision intelligence solutions provider for the insurance industry. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | AI-enabled Decision Intelligence, Insurance Tech, InsurTech, AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | Not published |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | Gradientcode |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | 2,572 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | Gradientcode |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 12/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | Gradientcode |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs Gradientcode: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or Gradientcode?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 12/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and Gradientcode compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 12/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 39/100), LinkedIn following (20,419 against 2,572).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the Gradientcode review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.