At-Bay vs Duck Creek Technologies
At-Bay vs Duck Creek Technologies, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and Duck Creek Technologies on 52/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 52/100
- funding raised: $292M against $120M
Duck Creek Technologies
- domain rating: 68/100 against 61/100
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | Duck Creek Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | SaaS core systems provider for the P&C and general insurance industry. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | InsurTech, Vertical SaaS, SaaS, Low Code |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | Duck Creek Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | $120M |
| Latest round | Series D | Private Equity |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | Duck Creek Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 11/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | Duck Creek Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs Duck Creek Technologies: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or Duck Creek Technologies?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and Duck Creek Technologies compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 52/100), funding raised ($292M against $120M). Duck Creek Technologies leads on domain rating (68/100 against 61/100).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the Duck Creek Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.